Both countries see themselves as isolated democracies threatened by neighbors that train, finance and encourage terrorism, therefore both countries also view their cooperative relationship as a strategic imperative. Relations between Jerusalem and New Delhi were not always warm. Although both countries gained their independence from the United Kingdom within months of each other, they found themselves headed in pointedly different directions for nearly four decades — India as a leader in the Non-Aligned Movement that maintained close relations to the Arab world and the Soviet Union ; Israel which linked its future to close ties with the United States and Western Europe. India extended de-jure recognition to Israel in and allowed Israel to maintain a consulate in Mumbai Bombay to facilitate the voluntary immigration of thousands of Indian Jews to Israel.
March 06, March 05, But a visceral Indo-phobia, shared by many of our influentials, stood in the way of consumers benefiting from the lower priced supply. Because of their unending mutual hostility, South Asia too has become the least integrated region in the world.
Sadly, the most populous region in the world has also remained home to the largest number of poor people in the world. So near, so far A few striking examples will show how our two countries, which were part of a single seamless socio-economic and cultural entity beforehave now completely drifted apart.
There are no direct flights between their capitals — New Delhi and Islamabad. The frequency of Delhi-Lahore and Mumbai-Karachi flights have become minimal.
The Mumbai-Karachi ferry service the two port cities, once part of a single province, are closer to each other than either Mumbai and Delhi or Karachi and Islamabad was stopped after the war.
In this age of information revolution, the number of phone calls between Indian and Pakistani citizens including calls between close relatives of divided families is negligible, mostly out of fear of being questioned by their respective security agencies.
Those who are happy with this status quo have set responses. On the Indian side, it will be said that terror and trade cannot go together. The Narendra Modi government has raised the bar higher — terror and talks cannot go together.
On the Pakistani side, resolution of the Kashmir issue has become a precondition for any substantial bilateral cooperation. But is the status quo benefiting either country? The answer is obvious, except to those arrogant ultra-nationalists who think India now has a seat on the global high table and hence need not care for Pakistan, and to those narrow-minded Pakistani patriots who think they need not care for India since they now have two protectors — China and the Muslim Ummah.
Arms manufacturers and distant destabilisers will profit by this at the cost of common Indians and Pakistanis, who need employment, education, health care and food-and-environmental security.
These needs can be met only through regional cooperation, not regional rivalry. China, part of the solution In other words, can China become a part of the solution, rather than being perceived as a part of the India-Pakistan problem?
Modi has allowed himself to be misled by his advisers on the BRI. Therefore, connectivity, cooperation and economic integration are the only realistic bases for any future India-Pakistan settlement of the Kashmir dispute.
Already, Iran, Afghanistan and several Central Asian republics have agreed to join this ambitious regional connectivity project.
Will it help or hurt India if it joins this renamed initiative as an equal partner? Will it not connect Lahore and Amritsar also Delhi and the rest of Indiathe two sides of Kashmir which all Kashmir-based political parties wantSindh and southern Punjab with Gujarat and Rajasthan, and Karachi with Mumbai?
And if our leaders show vision, ambition and resolve, the CPEC-plus-India can be linked to the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Corridor, thus creating a grand garland of connectivity and integration for the whole of South Asia.
If divided our subcontinent, here is an opportunity for India, Pakistan and all other countries in the region to come together and rise in shared progress and prosperity. Regrettably, the same short-sighted advisers who have misled Mr. This is unlikely to take off.
Even if it does, its developmental benefits to India will be limited since it will seek to keep China and Pakistan out. Here is another huge potential gain for South Asia. The proposed connectivity initiative, which would create strong new bonds of regional cooperation and interdependence, could also help resolve three long-standing geopolitical problems in the region, in which countless people have been killed — terrorism, Kashmir and Afghanistan.
To realise this vision of a resurgent South Asia, two obstacles will have to be removed blind nationalism and the unfriendly designs of extra-regional powers. As Karl Marx would have said: You have nothing to lose but your chains; you have a bright new future to win.China’s protests this month over a surge in relations between its rival Taiwan and the United States may prompt eventual retaliation by nervous officials in Beijing, analysts say.
The head of. The diplomatic turnaround of China and India since a military stand-off on their disputed border last year proves the resolve of both nations to avoid conflict. Custom Search Country Studies Index.
China–India relations, also called Sino-Indian relations or Indo-Chinese relations, refers to the bilateral relationship between the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of caninariojana.comgh the relationship has been cordial, there are border disputes and an economic competition between the two countries that have at times led to strained relations.
S elf-serving politics threaten not only to strain Pakistan’s relations with the United States, but heighten tensions in the geostrategic region of Balochistan, a vital node in Beijing’s Belt.
India-China-Pakistan cooperation can transform the subcontinent — joining a renamed CPEC would be a good start.